My Saab journey started with a guy named Nathan and a Saab 9000 Turbo

This is a very special post. I’ve done a lot of things in life that I never thought I’d do, largely thanks to my work revolving around Saab Automobile. I’ve travelled quite a bit, covered some wonderful motor shows and other events, I’ve worked in Sweden for Saab and most importantly, I’ve met some absolutely wonderful people all around the world.

Maybe all of that would have happened anyway, but it didn’t all just “happen”. It happened primarily because a friend of mine bought a Saab back in the 1990’s. That guy was Nathan.

In the beginning, there was Rachel. We met in our early 20s at a college in Melbourne and were part of a group of friends who did a LOT of stuff together. From the car races to the bakery at morning tea to hanging out at Philip Island, it was a great time. Rachel’s family had a farm in Gippsland, in Victoria’s south-east and we’d visit there occasionally, too. It was at the farm that I first met Nathan, Rachel’s brother.

Nathan’s a few years younger than me and I was in my early 20’s at the time, so it came as a fairly big surprise to see him roll up one day in a 1986 Saab 9000 Turbo. The car would have only been 5 or 6 years old and worth a fair bit of money in early 1990’s dollars. European cars seemed to run in the family, though. Rachel had a Peugeot and Mum, Judy, had a Volvo 760 Turbo.

Nathan’s 9000 was the first Saab I ever rode in myself and the first Saab I drove. I’ve written about the experience once before, a post called The Damascus Road (at 200 km/h). We had an absolute blast in that car and for a kid who was only used to old Holdens and Fords, the Saab was a revelation. That car was so much of a revelation, in fact, that it shaped much of my adulthood and those driving experiences carry a fair bit of responsibility for the fact that you’re reading these words on your computer screen right now.

Time marches on. I moved to Tasmania in 1995 and haven’t seen much of Nathan since then. I’d heard that he moved to South Australia and had done a few other things with his life, as we all tend to do. Just before I moved to Tassie back in the mid-1990’s, Nathan had been tempted to trade his 9000 on a Toyota Rav4. I was with him at the time and talked him out of it. Because of that, though, I didn’t have any high expectations for him staying with Saab for very long thereafter.

I couldn’t have been more wrong.

Continue reading My Saab journey started with a guy named Nathan and a Saab 9000 Turbo

Walter Röhrl’s feet. (Or: In defence of the Audi A3/S3)

Pete’s response to my contention that the Audi A3/S3 is only for knobs. – SW

——

I guess I gave it away with the title but one of the reasons I’ll always give Audi the time of day goes right back to the early 1980’s and their seminal effect on the world via their rally cars. 

To me, nothing captures this more than the image of Walter Röhrl’s feet dancing across the three pedals of his Quattro like some kind of avante-gard church organist.  There seemed no rhyme or reason to my uneducated eyes but it was clearly a work of genius. 

The fact that Walter was able to translate the potency of his Quattro-driven monsters into pure speed altered the rally game, and then the road car game immeasurably.  Subaru, Mitsubishi, Ford, Citroen, Peugeot, Skoda….. to me they’ve all done a fantastic job of taking what Audi started just that bit further.

What’s more, I tend to see the S3 as the spiritual successor to those early 80’s rally cars, the S1 etc.  It’s compact, robust, built like a bank-vault and if you’re lucky enough to get an RS3 with the 5 cylinder engine, it goes quite well too. 

Those of you patient enough to read my work may recall the RenaultSport Megane also being a favourite of mine.  It’s somewhat of a favourite formula, I guess.  Small, handy, fast and fun.  A car that goes best when driven hard, the tachometer needle spending most of its time on the far side of the dial.

And thus, when confronted with Swade’s post from a few days ago – a choice between an admittedly very similar Audi or Golf – I will always choose the Audi. Well, almost. I”m pretty partial to the Golf R and I like VW vans, too, but perhaps you can see where I’m coming from.

Of course, it makes no sense to a man of Swade’s merciless logic but frankly, I don’t care.  Audi take me to edge of despair with their obsequious kow-towing to the VAG manifesto, their sama-sama interiors and component sharing (imagine how a Lamborghini tragic must feel when confronted with A4 electronics…) so I ignore the nonsense of the A1, the deluded grandeur of the A5 and the whole Q series may as well be invisible.

BUT….. show me a TTRS or even a modest A4 1.8t with a Quattro badge on its rump and the emotions that were forged in my younger days will come flooding back.  I don’t see a Golf in a slinky frock when an A3 pootles by. I see a car that is just a few options-boxes on an order sheet away from a snarling, gravel-spitting slingshot. A car that may well be dropping the kids off at school now but within the hour could feasibly be thundering up Pikes Peak.  See, there is nothing remotely logical about it. 

Now, I’m no rally expert and I really am quite prepared for some of you who I’m sure will go to town on my simplistic meanderings  – and please, feel free.  However, please also note that I’m not writing an expert opinion here, I’m just outlining my personal, subjective view on why I like Audi. 

Morevover, check out Walter Röhrl’s feet in the video below.  No matter what your motoring persuasion, I challenge you not to be impressed.

I should also add a footnote that despite all of the above, I still prefer to drive a Saab.  Don’t get me started…….

——

Electric cars should not be Saab’s immediate future (or anyone else’s)

News reports state that there’s a new bidder in the hunt for Saab Automobile’s bankrupt estate. Apparently it’s a consortium of Chinese and Japanese investors who are looking to build electric cars. Is it just me, or has this got disaster written all over it?

I retain some hope that Saab can be sold to a buyer who wants to make Saabs. Personally speaking, if that company is to be chosen from Mahindra, Youngman, or this Sino-Japanese consortium, then my vote goes to Mahindra. They are a genuine international industrial company who I think have a realistic feel for what’s actually involved in the car industry and can see a role for Saab in their portfolio. Unfortunately, though, realism hasn’t played a prominent role in the fate of Saab for some time.

Reports coming through (covered on SU today) seem to indicate that the Swedish government are neck-deep in talks regarding this electric car proposition. This isn’t overly surprising as the government in Sweden seems fixated on outcomes that either confirm or deliver political messages. Electric cars present a nice, happy, ‘green’ picture that’s very Swedish, even if it’s not overly realistic.

Continue reading Electric cars should not be Saab’s immediate future (or anyone else’s)

Question: Is the Audi A3 for knobs?

We have a little email group here in Australia and every day we address certain issues confronting the motoring world. It’s a tough job, but someone has to sort these things out.

Right now, we’re trying to find one of our people a new vehicle. There are set criteria in place, of course, and it’s been fun to see the suggestions being thrown around.

One of the models that came up in discussion was the Audi A3/S3 and I have to confess I teed off on it. It’s fair to say I’m not a fan.

My main argument lies with the A3 (as distinguished from the S3), which I see as little more than a gussied up Volkswagen Golf. Recent models are a little more distinctive, but the A3’s I see mostly here in Hobart are around 5 years old, like the one to the right, and whenever I see one, as I did on the way home from work tonight, the only thing I can think is “What a knob!”

The A3 of this era comes across to me as an old-school GM attempt to squeeze more money out of a small platform without really trying that hard. It’s bland beyond belief and at the price you’d pay for a new one (back when they were new) you would have been much more entertained with a Golf GTI. The GTI is a much more genuine car, too, with all of its hot hatch heritage intact. All Audi can do is try to dress that heritage in some fancier clothes.

The A3 of this era is a cash grab, plain and simple, and as such is a car for those with more money than sense.

The A3 of today looks a little more distinctive, but still plays in a segment that the Golf basically owns – the compact five door hatch market. You can pay as much as A$60,000 for a new A3 here in Australia (the ‘kick me’ sign for your back comes free). Why anyone would do that when you can get, once again, a Golf GTI for $15,000 less is beyond me. Sure, the Audi might have a nicer interior, but it’s not as if it’s awe inspiring and the GTI’s interior is poor by comparison.

The S3 is a little more compelling. It’s got a more powerful engine, more aggressive styling and again, a theoretically more sporty interior. But is the interior comparison that compelling in favour of the S3?

S3 above, GTI below……

If you think the A3 is expensive, then how about around A$80,000 for an Audi S3? You can get a 2012 model DSG Golf GTI for around $30,000 less, not to mention plenty of other hot hatches that will deliver plenty of motoring thrills, even if they’re missing the cachet afforded to the four-ringed badge right now.

Make no mistake, Audi make some wonderful motor cars. They are very close to out-Teutonic-ing the other storied German brands right now. It’s just that when it comes to the A3/S3 range, I reckon they’re laughing all the way to the bank and if you’ve bought one, they’re not laughing with you.

My final argument – why on earth would you spend $80,000 on an Audi S3, a performance oriented compact luxury vehicle, when you could spend the same money and get any of these (none of which, I might add, match the criteria for a new car that started this whole discussion, but still……).

All of those cars make a much more compelling argument for me at that price. More class, better fun, better re-sale, better in pretty much every way except carrying capacity.

IMHO, the Audi A3/S3 is for knobs. What say you?

I like the Hyundai Veloster

UPDATE: There is some Veloster news from Australia today, both good and bad. The good news for Hyundai is that they’re essentially sold out of Velosters at the moment. New buyers will have to wait three months for the 2+1 coupes, which according to Hyundai is a very pleasant surprise.

The bad news is that whilst the Veloster Turbo will be coming here mid-year, it’s predicted to sell for around $35K. It wasn’t so long ago that Hyundai got a foothold in the Aussie market selling cheap and cheerful hatchbacks for $13,000 on the road. Even if they can tune the chassis adequately (it takes more than just a turbo engine to make a decent driver) $35K seems like a bit too much, too soon, for a Hyundai hatch.

——

I never, ever thought I’d use the words “like” and “Hyundai” in the same sentence (not without including the words “to mock”, at least).

I remember a reader back in the SU days, a guy from Ireland called “J-Fan”, who trumpeted Hyundai’s virtues and was dismissed as quite possibly being mentally deficient by many at the time, me included (he’s still around, too – hello J-Fan). I drove an i30 for a week around 18 months ago and I thought it was absolute rubbish.

But I have to admit, I like the Hyundai Veloster. J-Fan’s revenge, perhaps?

I like what I see as a pretty funky design choice, with one door on the driver’s side and two doors on the passenger side. It’s perfect for someone who prefers coupes but sometimes has to carry someone in the back. I like the way they’ve executed the door designs, too. What I admire even more, however, is the courage and commitment Hyundai have shown to actually build this vehicle, and especially the fact that they’re building it in both right- and left-hand drive.

Have a look over the following video. Get past the hipster stuff and weigh up the offering objectively. If you find the design interesting, then it’s a very curious proposition.

The additional costs associated with making this 2-1 door configuration into a global vehicle must be huge, but given that Hyundai (and child brand, Kia) have been kicking goals all over the world in the last three years, they can obviously afford to make a statement like the Veloster.

Pros: The styling is cool, the practicality looks great and the equipment list is modern and generous.

Reservations: modest power (when’s that turbo model coming?), driveability, interior materials (horrible in the i30 I drove) and storage space.

I guess the evaluation of those would need a test drive. Hopefully Hyundai might be listening/reading – let’s see how good their media monitors are.

(Sub-par) Alfa Romeo GTV6 engine sound video

I filmed this last Saturday.

It gives you some idea of the wonderful sound of the Alfa V6 engine, though the sound quality on this recording isn’t great, to be honest. I’d also like to replace the exhaust for a throatier aftermarket unit in time. It’s nice, but there’s room for improvement.

The video was recorded with my HD Hero2 camera. The cases on the new Hero cameras don’t have the best sound qualities. I’ll try and do another one with my Rode microphone into another source.

Anyway, limited as it is, hopefully this will give you an idea of the Alfa V6 sound.

Space Monkey celebrates Alfa registration

The Alfa GTV6 is now registered and road legal here in Tasmania. WooHoo!

Next challenge – to grind away a few centimetres from the top of our driveway to stop it scraping. The cutting wheel has been purchased. Now all we need is some time and some dry weather.

While we wait, here’s a space monkey sent aloft by Aussie band, Skipping Girl Vinegar (good band names appear to be getting harder to find). They’re not the first to gaffa tape a video camera to a weather balloon, but they’ve got some of the best results, I think.

Nice song, too.

1985 Alfa Romeo GTV6 – what and why

The Alfa and I are back at home so it’s time to give you the run down on the car and the thought process that led me to buy it.

The Car – a brief history.

I thought it was a 1984 model, but it turns out my GTV6 was actually built in April of 1985. I’ve managed to get in touch with the car’s long-term owner, who had it from around 1990 to some time in 2008/9.

Click any of the images to enlarge.

Apparently the car started life as a dealer demo model, then it was leased on behalf a lady owner as her company vehicle. My contact, the long-term owner named Ross H, subsequently purchased it around 1990 with 89,000kms on the clock. To quote Ross, “It was the first one I saw, but after I had looked at about 20 more and it was still the best I’d seen, I went back and bought it – even though I didn’t really want a red one.”

Ross drove it to work for a few years – he was a race engineer at Gibson Motorsport after spending several years with Nissan’s motorsport team here in Australia. Concerned about the mileage he was putting on it, he bought a 4-cylinder Alfetta to wear out and garaged the V6. Ross then prepped and raced the car at Targa Tasmania in the early 1990’s.

Around 2002, the engine in the GTV6 was getting a bit tired, so it was removed and put to one side while a replacement V6 from an Alfa 75 was installed. A few years later, and just prior to a working trip to Asia, the original engine was torn down and rebuilt, a no-compromises restoration that Ross did with a view to driving and keeping the car on his return to Australia. The car had a lot of other work performed under Ross’ ownership as well (see below), all designed to make it the best a ‘stock’ GTV6 could be for an automotive engineer with a motorsport background.

Ross’ trip to Asia turned out to be a more permanent move than expected. I got a lot of this history from him early last week and he’s still there.

Ross sold the car a few years ago to the guy I bought it from last week. Upon learning the history of the car, I was really surprised that the owner didn’t make more of it in his advertising. He complained that he hadn’t had much interest. I think talking more about the vehicle’s very impressive history would have helped a lot. Prior to contacting Ross, I first heard about it from one of his colleagues, Doug G, via a posting on the AROCA website. Learning the vehicle’s history convinced me to look further and finally, to have confidence in buying the car.

Continue reading 1985 Alfa Romeo GTV6 – what and why

How to make a Ferrari look fat

Next to 99% of the automotive market, the Ferrari 599 is a svelte work of pure automotive pornography.

Put it next to a Koenigsegg Agera and a Pagani Zonda, however, and it looks like Mama Cass posing next to Twiggy.

I guess the upside for the Fezza is that next to the hypercars in this video, it does come across as being somewhere remotely close to cheap affordable.

Home

Earlier this morning, waiting to get off the boat…..

For the sceptics out there, I’ve done around 1,000kms in this car since picking it up on Friday night. It hasn’t miss a beat. In fact, it’s only got more addictive. And everything works, even the original radio (though it sounds like crap).

And here’s me (and Charli) about 30 minutes after getting home. The boat was rockin and rollin just a little too much to get a decent night’s sleep. 300kms or so later, I was out.

Exit mobile version