Alex Jones (Infowars) and Sunil Tripathi

This is not something I plan to cover at length or on an ongoing basis. This is not something I want people to get into a big fight over in comments, hence comments are off. It’s just something I noticed after a few discussions with a friend. I wanted to make a record of Alex Jones’ dealing with the Sunil Tripathi story here, primarily because I don’t think there’ll be a record of it anywhere else.

I think Alex Jones and his website, Infowars, is deceptive to the point of being outright dangerous. As a web publisher, I’m interested in how he and his team weave their stories. What are their publishing standards? Sadly, I’d say they’re either non-existant or based on ‘whatever creates the most fear’.

For me, the saddest story from the Boston Marathon bombing – aside from the obvious – is that of Sunil Tripathi. He was the university student who went missing back in March who was mistakenly named as a suspect in the bombing prior to the actual perpetrators being identified. The amateur sleuthing that led to Tripathi being named was mostly conducted on social sharing websites 4Chan and Reddit.

Infowars took great delight in the online identification of Tripathi. For them, it meant that someone other than the authorities (i.e. their kind of people) had done the job quicker than either the police or the mainstream media.

Infowars shared their delight, giving the cops, the feds and the media a good poke in the eye in an article titled Sunil-Tripathi: 4chan beats out FBI, news-media in identifying Boston bombing suspect.

As news reports come in identifying FBI Boston Marathon suspect as missing student Sunil Tripathi, it becomes clear that major community-driven internet boards like 4Chan are actually light years ahead of the mainstream media.

Of course, that story was wrong. Tripathi wasn’t a suspect. The online vigilantes and conspiracy theorists identified the wrong man and put his family – who were already deeply troubled by his disappearance – through an even greater hell for a very short, but intense period. Sadly, Sunil Tripathi’s body was found in water last week near his university. He’d been missing for around six weeks.

The authorities used dental records to identify the body as Mr. Tripathi’s. They did not immediately determine the cause of his death, but said his body had been in the water for some time.

Infowars is a massive site. Their media kit (which is a good hint as to why they really exist) claims 3 million unique visitors a month. When they run a story, a lot of people see it.

So when Infowars furthered the story of Tripathi being the suspect, they identified an innocent man as a terrorist based on no authoritative evidence and they pushed that story out to millions of readers – and they took pleasure in doing so

When it was made known that everyone had got it wrong, you’d think there might be some concern for the hardship they’d caused. Any site with even the slightest grain of integrity would have stood up, acknowledged and then corrected its error with some sort of apology, right? The head of Reddit apologised, after all. What about Infowars?

Sadly, if you clicked that first link from Infowars to read the full BS story, you ended up on a 404 Error page – “Page Not Found”. Rather than standing up and showing some personal or corporate integrity with an apology, Infowars simply erased the erroneous Sunil Tripathi story from the archive.

Having spent some time in the web publishing business, I figured that might happen, so I took a screenshot when it was still live.

What’s even worse, however, is that they’ve now distanced themselves from the snoopy-dance they did in the first story by placing the blame with 4Chan alone. In the Infowars coverage of Tripathi’s body being found, they write the following:

One of the individuals identified by 4chan users as a possible Boston bombing accomplice has been found dead in the Providence River…..

…..Tripathi’s possible connection to the Boston bombing was first raised by users of the 4chan website when it was pointed out that his image bore a similarity to one of the suspects first named by the FBI who later turned out to be Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev.

Users of the Reddit website later apologized to Tripathi’s family for making the erroneous connection, with one moderator writing, “We cannot begin to know what you’re going through and for that we are truly sorry.”

That’s almost kinda nice. They nearly sound like they’re writing about Tripathi from a caring point of view. But note that they completely neglect to mention their own pushing of Tripathi as a suspect as outlined in the first article, a mistake they made worse when they deleted the article and again when they dumped the blame on everyone else.

——

There are rules for evidence in a court of law for a reason. There are professional standards in journalism for a reason. The courts and the media don’t always get things right (especially the media), but I believe in the system. I believe the courts get it right more than they get it wrong and I believe there are still news sources out there that strive for factual reporting based on sound ethics and the substantiation of material.

Infowars? Forget the notion of editorial integrity. Their burden of proof seems to end at working internet connection.

The advent of the internet has been a good thing in some ways and a bad thing in others. The emergence of sites like Infowars is one of the more negative, even toxic aspects of the web. Sadly, I think the fear that Alex Jones and his cohorts peddle on that site – quite deliberately for the purposes of cultivating an audience to sell product to – that relentless fear will one day lead to some paranoid individual going over the edge and doing something terrible as a result.

Of course, they’ll cover it and report it as a ‘false flag’ attack perpetrated by the government in order to restrict your freedoms.

That’s just how they roll.

Compare And Contrast

Your homework for this weekend starts with you reading the two articles linked below.

Article one: A week with the Dacia Sandero (Sniff Petrol).

Article two: The 6 dullest cars in America (Yahoo Autos).

Done that? Good.

Now compare and contrast to figure out why one of these articles is great and why one of them is complete bollocks.

Your submissions will not be graded, but feel free to contribute anyway.

——

My Take

Sniff Petrol is more commonly known for its spoofing of the real-world motoring industry but in the last few months, Richard Porter has taken to doing this short car reviews. His reviews don’t discuss the 0-100 time of the car. They won’t tell you how many G’s you might pull in the corners, nor are there any WOW-factor statistics about the number of cow hides used in the interior. It’s just him and the car, day-to-day for a week, with him noting down the things that are either pleasant or unpleasant to live with (along with a little bit of Sniff humour thrown in for good measure).

They’re not detailed, but Porter’s generally do manage to communicate the essence of the car that he’s spent a week with.

In the Sandero review, he manages to break the car down into what makes it good – its simplicity and the fact that it’s 100% fit-for-purpose. He covers the one main thing that makes it a pain – no central locking (which I’d have to agree with as our Saab 9000’s central locking gave up 12 months ago – it IS a monumental PITA).

But he also sums up what makes it a great, cheap runabout vehicle. The trick is to see the vehicle in the right light.

By contrast, the Yahoo Autos article manages to treat its subject vehicles with shallow contempt. That the author seems like a willing participant makes it all the more embarrassing. It pretty much sums up some of the reasons the car industry is heading down a rocky path – stupid expectations and an inability to see a vehicle in light of its intended purpose.

Yes, it’s up to car companies to build vehicles that people want. Yes, it’s up to customers to find the vehicle that matches their intended use. The role of the reviewer is to try and bring the two a little closer together. If you can do that in an entertaining way, then more power to ya. If you simply want to bag a bunch of cars in the name of getting page views, then the publishing industry’s in poor shape.

Actually, the publishing industry IS in poor shape, which is probably why stuff like this persists.

Friday Snippets – the good, the bad and the expensive

The Good

I don’t think anything of particular importance has crossed my automotive radar in the last 7 days. Amazing.

I reckon this is pretty good, though. It might just be my next car. The current internal battle is between this exact car and a new-ish RenaultSport Megane. This 968 looks to be in pristine condition, has good mileage and a price I should be able to manage comfortably when it comes time for me to make a purchase. Hopefully it’s still available at that time.

The Alfa hasn’t sold, by the way, but I still have a buyer interested. Neither of us are in a hurry for our own reasons. He’s got things to take care of and I’m gearing up for Agfest next week, where Mrs Swade and I will be selling her prints and greeting cards for the first time. The greeting cards are so new they’re not even on that website, yet. It’s been a massive month of preparations and the last week has been especially busy (hence no new stories here).

——

The Good, part 2

From Petrolicious, the Ferrari 250 GT Lusso. Magic ensues.

——

The Bad

….and when I call this ‘The Bad’, I mean it’s the really, really, really bad.

Here’s a tip for all car companies – advertisements based on the theme of suicide are never, ever a good idea. It’s got to be about the 145,632nd best way to highlight a positive feature of your car. And given that most ads are meant to make you feel good about a product, you’d think that marketers would realise that suicide ads are just not funny (with one possible exception, which is more smirky than funny and wasn’t actually made by the company involved).

With all that said, what the hell were Hyundai thinking?

There’s so much they could say about this vehicle that’s positive. Why one earth would they go this route?

Hyundai’s kicked a lot of goals in the last 10 years with better vehicles, better warranties and much better sales as a result. They did that by having a plan and sticking to it with relentless focus and a commitment to executing the plan with precision.

This ad reeks of hubris. “We can be edgy and we have a big enough buffer to take a whack if it goes that way.” That’s your first sign that The Plan is starting to break down, that success has made you comfortable.

Stoopid.

——

The Expensive

…. but still beautiful.

Watch this first:

The print you can see Christian von Koenigsegg signing in that film is the start of a series of prints the company has commissioned to celebrate them making 100 cars in the last 10 years.

The series will comprise 10 different prints, though only three of them have been released so far. You can find them at 0to100in10years.com but be warned, the price tag isn’t for the feint-hearted.

The prints come in two sizes, what I’d call larger and larger. The smaller of the two is 80cm x 50cm, so it could hardly be classified as ‘small’. The prints will be super-exclusive, with just 5 of each design and size produced and then signed by CvK himself.

The price? The smaller of the two sizes will set you back €3,000, with the larger size (170cm x 120cm) costing a cool €5,500

Friday Snippets – Good Things

It’s great to be back after a few days working up country. Here are a few interesting car things from the last few days.

——

There are 29 Saabs for sale on Ebay – all in one lot. The cars are dated from 1955 to 1993. The seller is a collector in Portugal who’s not only selling his Saabs, but also his 34 Citroens and 29 Volkswagen buses.

The Saab lot includes:

  • 1 Saab 92b Year: 1955
  • 1 Saab 93 Year: 1959
  • 4 Saab 95 Year: 1967, 1968, 1975, 1978
  • 8 Saab 96 Year: 3 of 1961, 2 of 1966, 1969, 1974, 1978
  • 3 Saab 97 Year: 1968, 2 of 1972
  • 8 Saab 99 Year: 2 of 1970, 1972, 1973, 2 of 1974, 1978, 1979
  • 2 Saab 900 Turbo Cabriolet Year: 1986, 1993
  • 2 Saab 900 Turbo Year: 1980, 1981

It’d be nice if he were willing to separate. That Sonett II would be interesting to see.

The tough part? He’s asking 150,000GBP for this lot. That works out to around 5K per vehicle, which might represent reasonable value for some of the cars, but it’ll be overpriced for most of them, I think.

And who spends 150,000GBP on Ebay, anyway?

——

A stunning video from Petrolicious about a man and his V12 Ferrari Lusso.

Be mesmerised.

This is why people lovelovelove classic cars.

——

I’m actually making some progress on my own search for a new car.

I spent 4 days this week in the top-selling car for 2012 – a Ford Focus. The transmission was terrible and the car was way underpowered for enthusiastic driving, but the chassis and steering were very nicely balanced and it actually gave me some personal hope for modern cars.

As such, I’m spending more time combing the classifieds for a RenaultSport Megane. The current shape, at one or two years old, represents some pretty good value.

——

It doesn’t hurt, of course, that I won some RenaultSport schwag this week in a Facebook competition. Here’s the booty:

Should I consider it an omen that the mirror was detached from the car when I opened the box this morning?

In Renault’s defence, all items seen here were packed in the box with the car by someone other than Renault – which they shouldn’t have been.

——

If you want to watch one of history’s more obscure and interesting cars being re-built, subscribe to Mats’ Garage.

He’s currently pulling apart his Porsche 914 in order to add some go-faster bits and then put it all back together again. I spent not-nearly-enough time in that garage when I was living in Trollhattan a few years ago. It’ll be fun to watch as Mats only does quality work.

——

When I think cars and America, this is what I like to think.

OK, maybe not driving on the sand, but still….. an idyllic image.

——

And finally….

Wired.com review the Fiat 500e. Given that Fiat seems happy to lose a bucketload of money on each one, I’d say it’s the first EV that makes sense, both practically in a built-for-purpose sense, and financially.

EV’s are city cars. The 500 is the right size for zipping around town and it has the right range for an anxiety-free daily commute. The reason all that’s even up for consideration by yours truly is because the Fiat 500e also has an affordable 9/mo lease – if you live in California.

It looks pretty cool, too.

Targa Tasmania Gallery and Awards

I love Targa Tasmania. I love the celebration of driving and cars and petrol and all that caveman stuff. This year’s fleet was on show in Launceston last night and as I’m currently working in the north of the state, I thought it wise to pop in and have a look.

This year is unofficially dubbed (by me) as the Year of Renault. There are always plenty of Porsches at Targa and a good smattering of your modern Japanese REXEVOs but it’s rare to pick up a third dominant thread of cars. That changed this year with Renaults making a prominent mark.

There are at least five current model RenaultSport Meganes in the fleet, one RS Megane of the previous generation, as well as a couple of absolutely gorgeous vintage Renaults from a few decades ago, one of which is an Alpine. I went a bit overboard taking photos of the older Renaults so please forgive me if French metal isn’t your thing, but hopefully you’ll agree they were pretty compelling.

It would be remiss of me to not acknowledge the tragic death of a Targa Tasmania competitor earlier today. This is the first Targa death in 17 years. A driver, age 71, died when his Porsche Cayman came off the road and hit a tree. His 26 year old navigator was severely injured and is in hospital.

This is very serious, very active recreation with very real risks.

BEST IN SHOW…. goes to the aforementioned Renault pairing. It’s a Renault 5 Turbo2 and an original Renault-Alpine A110.

Renault 5 Turbo2 and Renault-Apline A110

——

BEST PRESENTED….. goes to the awesome work done on this Mazda RX-7

Mazda RX-7 Targa Tasmania

——

MOST QUESTIONABLE…. not only is this Porsche a most un-Targa-like Panamera, it’s also Left Hand Drive.

Porsche Panamera Targa Tasmania

——

MOST AUTHENTIC…… goes to this Datsun 1600. I’d be surprised if his Targa preparation amounted to anything more than a change of oil and plugs.

Datsun 1600 Targa Tasmania

——

MOST AUSSIE….. All that’s missing is the yobbo in a wifebeater with a tinny. Seriously Australian piece of machinery.

Holden Monaro Targa Tasmania

——

MOST LIKELY TO MAKE MY MATE MATS SPIT HIS CORNFLAKES ALL OVER HIS KEYBOARD….. Don’t know if it’s original, but this Porsche 914-6 sure would be fast. Looked great with the flares, too.

Porsche 914-6

——

MOST SENTIMENTAL FAVOURITE….. This Jensen CV8 is here every year and always looks awesome.

Jensen CV8

——

MOST IMPRESSIVE CARBIES…. on this Datsun 260Z.

Datsun Triple Carbs

——

BEST USE OF A DISPLAY CAR AS A DINNER TABLE BY ‘MODELS’ HIRED TO STAND NEXT TO IT….. The same Datsun. Launceston’s not quite Hollywood, ya know. The concept of hiring girlies to stand next to show cars is quite new to Targa. At this rate, I hope it doesn’t catch on.

Datsun 260Z

——

The rest of the Gallery is below. Lots and lots of photos, including a few too many of those gorgeous Renaults.

——

Video: Victor Muller Talks About The Spyker B6 Venator

I love my old boss. I’m so very pleased to see him looking happy and healthy after a hellish few years giving his life (and unfortunately failing) to resurrect Saab Automobile.

Spyker Cars took a new concept car to the Geneva Motor Show last month, the Spyker B6 Venator. I think it looks 100% A-grade HOT. Spyker say they’ll build it from 2014 and I wish them only the best of luck in getting themselves on their feet again. The B6 Venator looks like just the right car for the occasion, too.

In this 4 minute video, Victor Muller talks about the new car, revealing the inspiration behind it and his favourite design elements.

I’d buy one if I could. It looks that good.

——

What Will Happen If Volkswagen Buy Alfa Romeo?

I love Alfa Romeo. I’ve had four of them over the years. A Sprint, two 16V Alfa 33’s and my current GTV6. I hope to own more Alfa’s in the future, too. The 4C is now on my in-the-future list. I’m invested in this company.

So it’s with some degree of trepidation that I approach a persisting story, one with both a dark cloud and a silver lining attached to it.

First, though, there was another story through the week that prompted my concern. Fiat launched a new vehicle in Australia, called the Freemont. You can see a picture of it at the top of this story. Those of you reading this from the United States might recognise that vehicle. Where you live, it’s called the Journey and it has a Dodge badge on the front.

Here’s the Journey. Compare that with the car at the top.

This, of course, is some of the fruit of the new Fiat/Chrysler relationship. Some sharing of engines and architectures is to be expected, I suppose, but this is flat-out re-badging in a style not seen since the bad old days of pre-bankruptcy GM.

All this makes me wonder about Fiat, the company that owns my beloved Alfa Romeo.

Alfa Romeo currently has the rather unexciting MiTo and the much more interesting Giulietta in its range. The brand’s recent history includes a series of absolutely beautiful cars that weren’t quite able to drive as good as they looked. A driver’s brand devoid of a true driver’s car.

Fiat make all the right noises about being dedicated to an Alfa Romeo resurgence and the new Alfa Romeo 4C is the first evidence of that, creepy headlights and all. Fiat are promising a reintroduction of Alfa Romeo to the United States, a new Spider that will be developed in conjunction with Mazda’s new MX-5 and, as is seemingly compulsory these days, a premium SUV.

On the other hand, Fiat are basically just holding on thanks to Chrysler’s new-found success in the US. European sales have tanked. Fiat need a couple of home runs and as much as I love Alfa Romeo, Fiat are taking the brand upscale and a newly upscale Alfa isn’t the lifeline that Fiat needs. One can easily get the impression that Fiat are fattening the Alfa cow just prior to slaughter.

——

All of that leads us to a story that just won’t go away, despite public denials from people connected to the companies involved – the talk that maybe Volkswagen buy Alfa Romeo. The rumours first surfaced a few years ago and the story is still hanging around, covered again on several prominent motoring websites in just the last few weeks. Here’s one excerpt, from Ward’s Auto:

TURIN – Alfa Romeo is at the core of top-level negotiations between Audi and Fiat and might be near to a sale, reliable sources here and in Ingolstadt, Germany, say.

Sources close to both Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne and Audi CEO Rupert Stadler confirm the two are in talks over a major deal.

The top subject reportedly involves the sale of Alfa, but this time not only the brand but Fiat’s Pomigliano assembly plant also is on the table.

I do worry for the future of Alfa Romeo under its current owner. I worry because of Fiat’s short-sighted badge engineering as well as decisions like shutting down the Alfa Romeo museum, as they did a few years ago.

Fiat took Alfa Romeo off the Italian government’s hands in the mid 1980s. The cars have become more modern since then, but they’ve also become a bit more generic. Most have had beautiful styling, but then most have also been front-wheel drive.

The Alfa strategy also seems a little bit scatter-brained. The MiTo and Giulietta have their fans but they’re entry-level premium European cars. The Giulietta, especially, is a fine car but neither are banging down the door of the specialist or luxury car segments. Fiat seem to want to spark an upscale revival for Alfa, a focusing of the brand’s identity that’ll start with a car that looks like a true driver’s car – the 4C. Upscale Italian sportiness….. hasn’t Fiat already got Maserati for that? I know Maserati is more of a true luxury brand, but then Fiat did just announce a new Maserati Ghibli, priced down to fit under the Quattroporte at a point intended to make Maserati more accessible.

Alfa and Maserati are approaching one another, it seems.

So you could say I’m not opposed to a sale of Alfa Romeo, even if it’s to a non-Italian company like Volkswagen. But then you have to ask the question – are Volkswagen the right company to take Alfa Romeo into the future?

Here’s a graphic of the car brands currently owned by the Volkswagen Group. Well, nearly all of them. You can add Porsche into this picture, too, now.

There’s no doubting the success of the Volkswagen Group. They are currently the most profitable car company in the world and will overtake GM as the #2 car company in the world based on sales. Toyota won’t be far away in the #1 slot, either.

Their cars are all very well regarded with the possible exception of Seat, which is a rare VW failure so far. Skoda are making good quality, good value small cars and family cars. VW themselves range from the bland to the sporting. Porsche are Porsche. Audi have taken a place at or near the top of the Teutonic table. Lamborghini and Bugatti are hallmarks in the supercar and hypercar segments.

But here’s the thing that rubs me the wrong way.

The Volkswagen Group have made a success out of all of these brands but aside from Lamborghini, and Bugatti, is there anything in the range that has been built to really inspire? To me, the rest of the brands scream …….. competence. And I guess you could say that Lamborghini and Bugatti scream extreme competence.

What I’m wondering is whether or not Volkswagen have got the ability to build passion into their cars, because that’s what Alfa Romeo has traditionally had and that’s what Alfa Romeo needs to become great once again. That mad focus on one particular aspect of a vehicle, even at the cost of incompetence somewhere else. Will a German-owned Alfa Romeo allow poor ergonomics in order to have the car look just right, if need be? Will they make you skew your number plate to one side in order to preserve the symmetry of a heart-shaped grille? A great Alfa has flaws that accuentate the great things about it. Sad, but true.

Bottom line: Fiat are making a few dumb moves and they might need to sell Alfa Romeo to survive and focus. Can Volkswagen make an Alfa Romeo that a passionate person can truly fall in love with?

——

My tip: BMW could.

Classics By The Beach – April 2013

It’s the first Sunday of the month so it’s time for Classics By The Beach in Sandy Bay, just south of Hobart.

There was an emphasis on British classics this week with a number of them gathered on the central lawn. I’ve photographed a few of those and a general cross section of other vehicles from this month. It was a beautiful day here Hobart so the turnout was good, with few cars overlapping from last month.

Again, and as always, I’m amazed by the quality of cars tucked away in people’s garages for such a small, remote city.

Click to enlarge and enjoy.

——

Not A Good Week For Electric Car Companies

The BIG question surrounding the fledgling electric car business is whether its big enough to support all the people who want to get into it. For those wondering about the answer, it’s “NO”, just as it was with the internal combustion car business. The only remaining intrigue is about who’ll have a chair when the music stops.

Tesla

For the biggest of the pure EV start-ups it was a case of one step forward and two steps back.

The one step forward was the announcement of a ‘leasing’ plan that would allow more people access to Tesla vehicles without having to stump up their huge prices up-front. That’s good news. Offering what regular car companies can offer is essential if Tesla are going to become a regular car company.

The two steps back?

The first step back is best characterised by Tesla calling their lease plan ‘revolutionary’ and Wired.com calling it ‘bizarre’. Car & Driver went so far as to call the promotion of it Misleading. That’s the chasm between perception and reality at Tesla HQ right now.

Why the contention?

In selling their leasing plan, Tesla put together a calculator intended to show the ‘true cost’ of owning a Tesla under this plan. The problem being that the calculator was loaded with assumptions about how much people’s time is worth, how much time they’ll spend driving long distances and re-charging, and other stuff.

Calculators like these can be a good idea, but the blowback from this one wasn’t great for Tesla. Elon Musk announced the lease plan saying it was possible for the ‘true cost’ of owning a Tesla to be as low as $500 per month (the actual cash cost is at least $1,199 per month). Out of all the people in the motoring press who tried it out that I was able to read, the best of them got their ‘true cost’ down to around $650 per month.

My favourite mocking quote was a tweet from an Automotive News journalist:

“According to Tesla website, if you live in Calif. and make $2 million/year, driving a Model S has an effective monthly cost of minus-$2,000.”

Indeed. The lease/finance plan IS a great idea but Musk has got to learn that doing his own publicity is very much a double-edged sword. He gets it right a lot of the time, but he’s becoming the face of Tesla more than the Model S is, and when you get it wrong, that’s a really dangerous thing.

The second step back for Tesla wasn’t as widely reported, but it was covered here in Australia by one news source, at least. Tesla’s initial quarterly profit has been called into question after Bloomberg News talked with an owner and discovered that Tesla had asked customers to pay for orders up front in order to include them in their profit figure.

According to the email, Tesla was “right on the cusp of profitability this quarter for the first time in 10 years since the company started”.

It then encouraged customers to stump up their payment for the car “in order for Tesla to be able to count your Model S for the quarter”.

Essentially they robbed Q2 to pay Q1, which was a monumentally stupid idea as the market’s only three months away from finding out the real implications of this. Tesla’s share price has been up recently, too, quite possibly on the back of the profit announcement. I’m sure the regulators will be watching market transactions with interest.

Fisker

I don’t think Elon Musk is long any sleep over the stuff mentioned above, but imagine the headache Henrik Fisker must have today. Actually, cancel that. Henrik Fisker left the company that bares his name last month due to disagreements with the board.

So imagine the headache someone must have today after Fisker announced – on a Friday, of course – that it was sacking 75% of its workforce, effective immediately.

Have a nice weekend, folks.

Saab (NEVS)

I got an email from John Flores at New Motor Mag. He had just got off the phone after doing an interview with Mikael Ostlund from NEVS about the situation at Saab. You can read/hear the interview here.

Disclaimer: I haven’t listened to the 30-minute conversation yet.

But assuming they’ve done their job and included the salient points in the summary, then it’s a saddening event.

I conducted an interview with Mikael Ostlund a full five months ago and it seems that absolutely nothing has changed in terms of NEVS’s PR story for Saab. There’s either nothing going on (unlikely) or NEVS has had no change of heart about the way they communicate with potential customers.

It’s a very arrogant approach IMHO and it’s slowly but surely eroding any goodwill that people might have had toward the new Saab.

Petrolicious: The Hunter

Petrolicious is my new favourite website. It covers what I’d call modern vintage cars and it does it beautifully, with articles and beautifully shot videos that showcase why people love cars as well as the cars that they love.

I love older cars. They’re so much more interesting than 95% of the new stuff because they were made at a time when car companies had real, distinct identities. Car companies today are being beaten into conformity by the relentless pursuit of safety, fuel economy, and of course, the most important economy of all – economy of scale.

Modern cars with true individualism are rare. Affordable ones even rarer.

Petrolicious takes you back to a time where man and machine were close, a time when the only silicon chip to come between the two might – that’s might – control a fuel injection computer.

I saw this video on Petrolicious this morning and had to share it here. It’s called The Hunter and it features a man after my own heart (but with much greater means) who searches without remorse or relent for the next car-of-his-dreams.

Damn I love me a V8 Ferrari! And there’s a nice idea here for my mate Mats, too 🙂

Enjoy. And check out Petrolicious.

Exit mobile version